Text

Aesthetics and Its Discontents

Translated by Steven Corcoran Only yesterday aesthetics stood accused of concealing cultural games of social distinction. Now it is considered a parasitic discourse from which artistic practices must be freed. But aesthetics is not a discourse. It is an historical regime of the identification of art. This regime is paradoxical, because it founds the autonomy of art only at the price of suppressing the boundaries separating its practices and its objects from those of everyday life and of making free aesthetic play into the promise of a new revolution. Aesthetics is not a politics by accident but in essence. But this politics operates in the unresolved tension between two opposed forms of politics: the first consists in transforming art into forms of collective life, the second in preserving from all forms of militant or commercial compromise the autonomy that makes it a promise of emancipation. This constitutive tension sheds light on the paradoxes and transformations of critical art. It also makes it possible to understand why today?s calls to free art from aesthetics are misguided and lead to a smothering of both aesthetics and politics in ethics.

Availability

Detail Information

Series Title

-

Call Number

111.85 Ran a

Publisher

Cambridge : Polity., 2009

Collation

-

Language

Indonesia

ISBN/ISSN

9780745646312

Classification

111.85

Content Type

-

Media Type

-

Carrier Type

-

Edition

-

Subject(s)

AESTHETICS

Specific Detail Info

-

Statement of Responsibility

-

Other version/related

File Attachment